📈 Upside Analysis: Adoption, Challenges & Recommendations to Teams to Adopt Performance Tech Products

Performance technology has become an essential component of elite sports, influencing training, recovery, injury prevention, and decision-making. From wearable tracking devices to advanced biomechanics software, teams across various professional leagues integrate these tools to gain a competitive edge. However, the frequency of use and overall usability of these technologies must align with the workflow of sports practitioners for optimal effectiveness.

Key Statistics

• 30% of NFL teams used VR training for quarterbacks in 2023.

• 20% of professional rugby leagues mandated smart mouthguards by 2024.

• 70% of NBA teams used AI for player tracking (2023-2024).

• 80% of teams used sleep tracking by early 2024.

Source: Market.us Scoop

Key Study

• A study reported in PubMed Central examined the use of GPS technology to plan and monitor training load over an acclimatization period to prevent musculoskeletal injury. The study found that implementing a GPS-guided training program resulted in a lower overall prevalence of injury (Year 1: 92.6% vs. Year 2: 55.2%) and a reduced injury rate per 1000 exposure hours (Year 1: 8.1 vs. Year 2: 4.6).

Frequency of Use of Performance Tech Products

Teams use performance tech products at varying levels depending on their sport, budget, and staff expertise.

• Wearable GPS Trackers: Used in 95% of professional soccer and rugby teams, 80% in the NBA, and 65% in the NFL (Source: Global Sports Tech Report, 2023).

Frequency of Use by League

Performance technology adoption varies across leagues based on sport-specific demands, budget constraints, and cultural attitudes toward data-driven decision-making:

• NBA: Heavy use of video analysis, GPS tracking, force plates, HR monitoring, velocity training, and AMS (Athlete Management Systems). Thermography and rehab tech usage is increasing, but not yet widespread.

• NFL: Extensive use of GPS trackers, force plates, AMS, velocity training, especially for load management and injury prevention. Video analysis is critical for tactical breakdowns, but thermography adoption is lower than in other leagues.

• MLS: One of the highest users of GPS tracking due to the sport’s demands, alongside HR monitoring, AMS, and rehab tech. Video analysis plays a significant role in tactical development.

• MLB: Strong adoption of motion capture systems, force plates, and video analysis for pitch and swing mechanics. Less reliance on GPS tracking but growing interest in HRV monitoring and AMS.

• NHL: Significant use of force plates, GPS tracking, video analysis, and rehab technology. HR monitoring is used less frequently compared to endurance-based sports.

• NCAA: Varies by sport and funding, but AMS, velocity training, fitness equipments, video analysis, and GPS tracking are widely used in top-tier programs. Rehab tech adoption is rising, but many programs struggle with budget constraints.

Challenges in Using Performance Tech Products

Despite the advantages of performance technology, teams often face challenges in fully utilizing these tools. Some products require significant staff training, while others generate large amounts of data that are difficult to interpret or integrate into existing workflows. Additionally, some teams invest in cutting-edge technology but struggle with consistent use due to logistical issues, player buy-in, or a lack of clarity in actionable insights. As a result, certain performance tech products see inconsistent usage or become obsolete within a short period.

Several studies and reports also highlight challenges in the adoption and sustained use of performance technologies in sports:

• A report from Scoop Market News discusses interoperability issues, noting that about 40% of sports organizations struggle with integrating diverse technological systems, leading to inefficiencies in data flow and operational management, according to Market.us Scoop

• The same report also mentions that 35% of coaches are hesitant to use advanced analytics tools, and 45% of athletes express reluctance due to privacy concerns, underscoring the need for better education and assurance about the value and safety of these innovations, according to Market.us Scoop

The Need for Performance Tech Products to Fit the Workflow

While performance technology offers tremendous potential to elevate athlete care and performance, its true value is only realized when it integrates seamlessly into the everyday routines of practitioners—including sports scientists, athletic trainers, strength and conditioning coaches, and rehabilitation specialists. To be effective, these tools must enhance, not hinder, the flow of work and communication across departments. Key considerations include:

1. Automated Data Collection: One of the most significant barriers to adoption is the time burden placed on staff. Performance technology must minimize the need for manual data entry or repetitive setup tasks. Systems that automate data capture—whether through integrated wearables, syncing with other platforms, or pre-set collection protocols—free up staff to focus on interpreting insights and engaging with athletes.

2. Real-Time Feedback: For technology to inform decision-making, it must provide timely, actionable insights during sessions. Tools that deliver immediate performance feedback on variables such as load, asymmetry, movement quality, or fatigue levels allow coaches to adjust drills, modify volume, or intervene proactively. This responsiveness improves the precision of training and supports injury prevention efforts.

3. Integration with Existing Systems: Performance data should flow smoothly into athlete management systems, health records, and team dashboards. Siloed or incompatible systems increase workload and reduce the accessibility of insights. The best technologies offer open APIs or are already integrated with widely used platforms (e.g., Orreco, Teamworks/Smartabase, ActionApps, etc), ensuring that information is centralized and easy to interpret across roles.

4. Minimal Player Disruption: Athlete buy-in is critical for consistent data collection. Devices that are bulky, distracting, or uncomfortable can hinder performance or compliance. The most effective wearables are lightweight, non-intrusive, and embedded into standard apparel or equipment. Tech should blend into the athlete's routine, not stand out from it.

Annual Technology Audits in Professional Teams

To ensure efficiency and cost-effectiveness, most professional teams conduct an annual technology audit to assess their current performance tech tools. This audit helps teams determine which technologies are frequently used, which ones have become redundant, and which need to be replaced or upgraded. By systematically reviewing their tech inventory, teams can prevent unnecessary expenditures and ensure that the tools they invest in align with their performance goals.

Impact of Coaching Changes on Performance Technology

Changes in coaching staff can significantly influence the performance technology used by a team. New coaching staff often bring their own philosophies, training methodologies, and preferred technologies, which can lead to shifts in the tools used for performance monitoring and analysis. Some teams may phase out existing technologies in favor of those the new staff is familiar with, potentially disrupting workflows or causing friction with existing practitioners who have optimized their routines around previous systems. Balancing continuity with innovation is crucial during coaching transitions to maintain consistency in player performance tracking.

A Typical Day for Practitioners

1. Morning Check-ins: Start the day by reviewing each athlete’s wellness reports, including subjective questionnaires and objective data such as sleep duration, sleep quality, resting heart rate, and readiness scores. These insights help identify fatigue, stress, or early signs of potential injury, enabling proactive intervention before training begins.

2. Pre-Training Assessments: Before athletes step onto the field or into the gym, conduct baseline performance checks using tools such as force plates, motion capture, or GPS warm-up tracking. These pre-training assessments provide real-time feedback on neuromuscular readiness, asymmetries, and potential movement deficiencies, helping tailor the session to the athlete’s condition.

3. On-Field or In-Gym Monitoring: During training, use wearable technologies—including GPS units, inertial sensors, and heart rate monitors—to track external loads (e.g., total distance, sprint count, accelerations) and internal loads (e.g., heart rate zones, perceived exertion). This ensures that intensity and volume align with training goals and individual thresholds, reducing the risk of overtraining.

4. Post-Training Recovery Monitoring: After the session, capture recovery metrics such as heart rate variability (HRV), blood lactate levels, and athlete-reported muscle soreness or fatigue. This data helps gauge how well the athlete is recovering and informs short-term decisions like cooldown protocols, nutritional strategies, and sleep optimization.

5. Evening Review and Adjustment: At the end of the day, coaches and performance staff meet to review the accumulated data. They assess how each athlete responded to the session and make adjustments to upcoming training loads, recovery protocols, or individualized plans. This iterative feedback loop ensures a dynamic and responsive approach to performance management.

Recommendations to Teams

• Prioritize Seamless Integration: Select performance technologies that can be smoothly incorporated into your team's existing systems and workflows. Integration challenges often hinder adoption and reduce the utility of new tools. Prioritize platforms that are compatible with your data ecosystem and can communicate with other tech solutions to avoid siloed information.

• Invest in Comprehensive Staff Training: It's not enough to have advanced tools—your staff must know how to use them effectively. Provide ongoing training to ensure that coaches, sports scientists, and medical staff can confidently extract meaningful insights from the technology. User-friendly interfaces and role-specific onboarding can accelerate adoption and increase day-to-day impact.

• Tailor Solutions to Individual Athletes: Athletes respond differently to data, technology, and interventions. Customize how you apply tech-driven insights based on individual needs, position-specific demands, and personal baselines. Personalized performance and recovery plans often yield better results than one-size-fits-all approaches.

• Balance Technology with Coaching Intuition: While data offers valuable insights, it should serve as a complement—not a replacement—for experienced coaching judgment. Encourage collaboration between tech teams and coaching staff to blend analytics with instinct, contextual knowledge, and sport-specific experience.

• Conduct Regular Reviews of Effectiveness: Schedule routine evaluations of all performance technology tools to assess their real-world impact. Consider athlete engagement, staff feedback, injury trends, and measurable performance improvements. Be prepared to adapt, upgrade, or sunset tools that no longer meet your evolving needs.

Conclusion

Performance technology is revolutionizing elite sports, but its true effectiveness lies in how well it fits within daily operations. While the frequency of use is high, teams must focus on usability, integration, and actionable insights. By selecting the right tools and ensuring smooth implementation, elite teams can maximize the benefits of performance technology for long-term success. Conducting regular audits, addressing usability challenges, and adapting to coaching transitions will further enhance the long-term effectiveness of performance tech in professional sports.

You may also like: