This week we have the honor to interview a group of rehab and performance experts across the NFL and NHL. We discussed concussion assessment and management, their approach to this topic, the various modalities, best practices and trends that they are seeing in the market.
Alexi Pianosi, Head S&C coach at the Colorado Avalanche, an NHL team.
Kim Brouzes, an experienced Canadian sports therapist and CEO of Kinmetrix which built an advanced neck strengthening device collecting data.
Ryan Juarez, the director of rehabilitation at the Commanders, an NFL team.
đShow Notes: Through this interview, we touched on concussion assessment and management related topics especially:
How concussion assessment protocols have evolved in their sports over the past few years, and which new tools or technologies (e.g., SCAT6, eye-tracking, neurocognitive platforms, and in-race or in-game monitoring) are being integrated today.
What roles wearable technologies, video analysis, saliva analysis, connected mouth guards, sensor based helmets, or AI are playing in real-time concussion detection and post-impact evaluation across their sports (NFL, NHL).
How sports organizations handle education and awareness for players, coaches, and staff around concussion risk, symptoms, and reporting culture.
Looking forward, what they see as the next frontier in concussion prevention or managementâwhether itâs data, equipment, policy, and so on.
You can read the full transcript of the podcast interview located at the top of this blog post.
Here are some of the best quotes of our conversation with Alexi, Kim and Ryan:
1. How have concussion assessment protocols evolved, and what new tools are being integrated?
Kim Brouzes:
âIn Ontario, we have something called Rowanâs Law. It came about after Rowan Stringer, a young athlete, tragically passed away from Second Impact Syndrome. This law brought in strict rules for diagnosing and managing concussions. If a concussion is suspected, the athlete must be referred to a doctor or nurse practitioner for diagnosis, and then they're put into what we call a protocol. We mandate 24 hours of brain rest, then begin aerobic activity, neck treatments, and from there we figure out what type of concussion theyâre dealing withâwhether it's visual, vestibular, cervicogenic, or another type. There are about six different systems we consider. This informs the specific treatment plan and helps us guide them through recovery in a structured, safe manner. Itâs a highly legislated and systematic approach designed to prioritize athlete health.â
Ryan Juarez:
âWhen I started in the NFL as an intern in 2005, concussion protocols were pretty limited. By 2012, when I came back full time, awareness had improved, but we were still figuring a lot out. Now, things have evolved tremendously in a positive way. In the NFL, we use tools like C3 Logic as part of baseline and return-to-play screening, and we still use Impact testing. At the college level, Iâve also worked with Sway, which assesses balance. There are now spotters in the booth looking for visible signs during games, and weâve got league- and conference-driven assessment protocols we have to follow. All of this is a far cry from when I started. Weâre more structured, more evidence-driven, and far better equipped to identify and manage concussions.â
Alexi Pianosi:
âOver the last 10 years, concussion management has improved significantly, especially in pro sports. But what's also become clear is how little we still know. Weâve moved away from a one-size-fits-all approach, and now recognize that different teams, organizations, and even individual practitioners can approach concussion management differently. Some are more risk-averse, some are quicker to return players based on symptoms and initial tests. That variability isnât necessarily badâit allows for creativity and innovationâbut it also means thereâs no standardized protocol across the board. Laws like Rowanâs Law are a step toward consistency, but weâre still in the early stages of understanding how to best manage and treat concussions comprehensively.â
2. What role are wearable technologies, video analysis, saliva analysis, connected mouthguards, or AI playing? Differences across sports?
Ryan Juarez:
âIâve had experience using sensor-based helmets and connected mouthguards, particularly at the college level. We used them to identify the type and location of impacts, which helped inform practice planningâlike what drills might be causing more head contact. We also had a donor-funded saliva biomarker study with our womenâs lacrosse team, which was fascinating. Iâm still learning about a lot of this newer techâAI, surface EMG, etc.âbut Iâm excited by it. One example Kim told me about was a Canadian researcher using EMG sensors on the knees to track the delay in brain-to-muscle signal transmission post-concussion. Thatâs pretty wild and really promising. But even with all the tech, I keep reminding myself and others: sometimes, good clinical judgment and knowing your athlete can be the most valuable tools.â
Kim Brouzes:
âThereâs a ton of innovation right nowâsaliva testing for biomarkers post-concussion, surface EMG sensors showing delayed muscle responses linked to the autonomic nervous system, eye tracking, AI... But no matter how many tools you have, we canât overlook the importance of the human element. When you know your athlete, you see mood changes, eye movement differences, or how they carry themselves. Thatâs something tech canât fully replicate. Itâs exciting to have all these new ways to gather data, but youâve got to use your instincts and experience too. Impact and symptom should still equal removal from play, full stop.â
Alexi Pianosi:
âThereâs a ton of promise in wearable devices, saliva testing, and other tech, but weâre not at the point where we can definitively say, âThis metric means a concussion.â Itâs not like speeding on a highway where 65 mph is a clear threshold. You might see one guy take a massive hit and bounce back totally fine, while another barely gets touched and canât remember who you are. The variability is massive. So we need to gather data on mouthguards, biomarkers, reaction timeâall of itâbut we also need to understand what those measurements mean in context. Eventually, I hope weâll get to a point where we can say, âThis sensor measures the vestibular response really well, this one the visual system,â and build an integrated view of what a concussion really looks like on multiple levels.â
3. How does your organization handle education and awareness around concussions?
Alexi Pianosi:
âIn the NHL, every training camp starts with a mandatory concussion education video. It features former players sharing their stories and symptoms. Itâs definitely valuable, though for veterans it can get repetitive over time. That said, the cultural shift is the most important part. The old âplay through itâ mentality is mostly gone now. Players take it seriously. If theyâve got symptoms, they speak up. And thatâs a huge step forward for long-term brain health and player safety.â
Ryan Juarez:
âIn both the NFL and at the college level, thereâs required education at the start of every season. The biggest change Iâve seen, though, is how players look out for each other. Ten years ago, guys would hide symptoms to stay on the field. Now, youâll hear teammates saying, âGo get checked out.â That shift in peer culture is powerful. The more that happens, the more likely we are to catch injuries early and keep guys safe.â
Kim Brouzes:
âHere in Ontario, the education component is taken seriously. Athletes and coaches must complete online training at the start of the season. Anyoneâcoaches, trainers, even mediaâcan pull a player out if a concussion is suspected. The messaging is improving, too. Itâs less fear-based now and more about empowerment and awareness. When you tell athletes they may not feel like themselves for a while, and thatâs normal, it helps. We educate all the way from preseason to post-return to play.â
4. What is the next frontier in concussion prevention or management?
Alexi Pianosi:
âTotal prevention seems unlikely in collision sports like football or hockey. Youâve got big athletes moving fastâitâs part of the game. But the next big steps are better detection and better rehab. On the sideline, real-time diagnostics like mouthguards or saliva testing will be game-changers once the science catches up. And for the tougher casesâthose 5 to 10% that donât follow the normal recovery pathâweâll need better ways to address specific systems, like vestibular or visual issues. Itâs going to take both technological innovation and clinical expertise.â
Ryan Juarez:
âIf I could dream big, Iâd love to see sideline tech that gives you an accurate, immediate read on whether a player has a concussion. That would be huge. I also believe in equipment upgradesâweâve used Guardian Caps and saw our concussion numbers drop by half. Thatâs a real impact. And the more data we haveâwhether itâs load tracking, EMG, or reaction metricsâthe more confident we can be about when a player is really ready to come back.â
Kim Brouzes:
âWe might not be able to fully prevent concussions, but we can reduce their severity and improve how we manage them. That means fewer hits in practice, strengthening the neck, delaying contact sports until kids are older, and understanding things like sleep and nervous system balance. If we can build a profile on each athleteâtheir physiology, their normal responsesâwe can be more precise when somethingâs off. But I agree, knowing exactly when a concussion happens and acting quickly is the biggest leap we can make.â
You may also like:
đ„Upside NFL/F1 Group Chat with Pieter Bulsink (Maverick Training/F1), Kim Brouzes (Kinmetrix), Ryan Juarez (Commanders/NFL) On Neck Training
This week we have the honor to interview a group of rehab and performance experts across the NFL and F1. We discussed neck training, their approach to neck training, the various modalities, best practices and trends that they are seeing in the market.